
Seeing Systems
AI Drone Systems for Defence
About
We’re building modular strike and reconnaissance drone platforms and a corresponding super-easy-to-use swarm control system in collaboration with Royal Marine Commandos, US, and allied nations, to fill a capability gap. Why? Because modern conflict has led to a shift in the procurement landscape. It’s now possible to work directly with military units to build what they need, which is exactly what we’ve been doing at Seeing Systems. Think of us as Anduril, but with worse weather, and better banter.
Founders
Founder
Cofounder & CEO of Seeing Systems. Obsessed with unmanned systems from a young age, self-taught in embedded electronics and PCB design. Previously designed Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) training and diagnostic hardware for military users as well as projects with national security implications. From a small island called Guernsey, now building tech that keeps the country safe.
AI Research Report
Problem & Solution
Problem/Solution Report
Problem: Modern conflict has accelerated the need for adaptable, attritable, and autonomous aerial systems that can be procured and iterated quickly with front‑line units. The UK and some allied nations face capability gaps in autonomous drone hardware—particularly in field‑ready, modular sUAS with resilient autonomy and easy‑to‑use team control. Procurement shifts now permit working directly with units to rapidly co‑develop what they need, but incumbent systems can be expensive, cumbersome, or slow to adapt to evolving mission profiles (ISR, strike, EW, comms relay) in contested, GPS/RF‑denied environments.
Solution: Seeing Systems builds modular strike and reconnaissance UAV platforms and an ultra‑simple swarm control system in close collaboration with Royal Marine Commandos, US, and allied partners. The company positions its systems as smart, affordable, and robust—“autonomous platforms that think with purpose”—with resilience and computer‑vision‑driven AI baked into a best‑in‑class hardware backbone (HERMES). The modular approach supports tailored sensor payloads, configurable autonomy modes (from human‑in‑the‑loop to fully autonomous), and mission‑specific configurations for defense, border security, disaster response, and infrastructure security. The company pairs products with hands‑on training and documentation to enable confident deployment and sustainment.
Seeing Systems emphasizes practical, real‑world performance: design for impact, end‑to‑end prototyping, industrial design for defense and field use, and electronic‑warfare resilience. The team is rooted in Cambridge’s “Silicon Fen” and leans on close user collaboration, rendering the product/engineering loop faster and more relevant to operators. This collaboration is extended via consultancy relationships, helping organizations adapt systems to their mission and build capabilities (people, process, and tech) around them.
Value proposition: Modular, affordable systems built with users, not just for them; resilient autonomy (including swarm teaming) that reduces operator cognitive load; and rapid iteration to match evolving mission needs. By addressing the UK’s lag in autonomous drone hardware and aligning with modern procurement dynamics, Seeing Systems aims to deliver capability where and when it matters.
Market & Competitors
Market and Competitors Report
Market context: The defense sUAS and autonomy market is expanding quickly, with global military drone spend growing at double‑digit CAGRs into the 2030s. Trends include (1) preference for modular, multi‑mission small platforms; (2) software‑defined autonomy and edge AI for ISR/targeting in contested environments; (3) simplified command‑and‑control that enables single‑operator or small‑team control of multiple assets; and (4) integration with broader C4ISR and counter‑UAS postures. Seeing Systems’ UK‑centric narrative and allied engagements fit the broader shift toward unit‑level co‑development and rapid fielding.
Competitors and comparables:
- Anduril (US) – Ghost and Ghost‑X expeditionary sUAS platforms paired with the Lattice autonomy/C2 stack. Emphasize intuitive autonomy, multi‑payload capacity, and operations in contested RF/GPS conditions.
- Skydio (US) – Defense/tactical solutions centered on the Skydio X10D with strong autonomy and human‑machine teaming, including GPS/RF‑denied operation.
- Shield AI (US) – Hivemind autonomy enables fully autonomous ISR and mission execution on platforms like V‑BAT/X‑BAT, emphasizing resilience in denied environments.
- Quantum‑Systems (DE/US) – Vector AI eVTOL sUAS, combat‑proven, mission‑flexible ISR platform with 2‑in‑1 multicopter/fixed‑wing design.
- Teledyne FLIR Defense (US) – R80D SkyRaider, open‑architecture, multi‑mission Group 1 VTOL with robust AI edge compute and up‑to‑7.7 lb payload.
- Edge Autonomy (US) – VXE30 VTOL UAS for long‑endurance imaging, fully autonomous hybrid design.
Competitive positioning for Seeing Systems: The company frames itself as “Anduril, but with worse weather—and better banter,” signaling similar ambitions in modular sUAS and swarm control, but at a UK/Europe‑centric scale with a design‑for‑affordability ethos. Advantages include close collaboration with front‑line units (e.g., Royal Marine Commandos) and a focus on intuitive swarm C2. Potential disadvantages are relative scale, capital intensity versus large incumbents, and the need to navigate export/compliance regimes. Nonetheless, Cambridge roots, consultancy‑driven relationships, and emphasis on resilient, modular hardware (HERMES) and training create a differentiated value proposition for UK and allied users seeking rapid, mission‑specific capability.
Overall outlook: The market’s rapid growth, coupled with a shift toward modular, software‑centric solutions, creates a sizable opportunity for Seeing Systems. Success will hinge on leveraging its close user partnerships to out‑pace larger competitors on agility and domain‑specific tailoring while expanding its addressable market through proven autonomy and swarm capabilities.
Total Addressable Market
Quantitative TAM Report
The core addressable market for Seeing Systems spans military UAV platforms (particularly small UAS/sUAS for reconnaissance and strike) and autonomy/swarm control software, with adjacent opportunity in counter‑UAS (C‑UAS) and mission software. Multiple market sources indicate robust, compounding growth for military drones through 2030‑2032. Fortune Business Insights estimates the military drone market was $14.14 B in 2023, growing to $16.07 B in 2024 and reaching $47.16 B by 2032 (CAGR ~14.4%). Market triangulation with additional sources suggests a 2032 TAM on the order of $44‑$47 B globally for military UAVs (GMI estimates $44.5 B by 2032 off a $14.6 B 2023 base). MarketsandMarkets presents a more conservative vector to $21.81 B by 2030 (7.6% CAGR), highlighting scenario variance.
Within that global military UAV TAM, the sUAS/small UAV segment is a major and growing component. One global estimate for small UAVs—across commercial and defense—projects growth from $7.44 B in 2025 to $16.06 B by 2032 (CMI). Because that total spans both civil and defense uses, a defense‑only sUAS sub‑TAM requires an allocation methodology. A reasonable approach is to allocate a share of the broader military UAV market to sUAS based on program mix. If sUAS account for roughly 30‑40% of military UAV platform spend by 2032 (reflecting field trends toward man‑portable and attritable systems), the implied military sUAS TAM would be on the order of $13‑$19 B of the ~$44‑$47 B military UAV total by 2032.
Command‑and‑control and autonomy/swarming software represent a further portion of the spend. While narrowly scoped “swarm C2 software” dollar estimates are sparse publicly, adjacent markets offer bounding references. Counter‑UAS is projected to grow from ~$6.64 B in 2025 to ~$20.31 B by 2030 (MarketsandMarkets), and anti‑drone from ~$2.45 B in 2024 to ~$12.24 B by 2032 (Fortune). These adjacent figures imply significant budget reallocation into drone‑centric C4ISR, autonomy, resilience, and software—categories aligned with Seeing Systems’ swarm control ambitions. As a working heuristic, autonomy/C2 software often represents a mid‑teens to low‑twenties percentage of total UAS system program costs; applying 15‑20% to the 2032 military UAV TAM would imply a $6‑$9 B software/autonomy opportunity by 2032.
In sum, an indicative TAM framing for Seeing Systems by 2030‑2032 is: (1) global military UAVs ~$22‑$35 B by 2030 and ~$44‑$47 B by 2032 (source‑dependent); (2) military sUAS sub‑TAM potentially ~$13‑$19 B by 2032, based on a 30‑40% allocation; and (3) autonomy/C2 software in the range of ~$6‑$9 B by 2032 if 15‑20% of UAS spending is software‑centric. These quantitative anchors, combined with bottom‑up prospecting (e.g., UK MOD, Royal Marines, allied units, border security, and SAR agencies), provide a defendable sizing methodology for Seeing Systems’ focus areas.
Methodology: triangulate top‑down analyst forecasts (Fortune Business Insights, GMI, MarketsandMarkets) for military UAVs; use separate small UAV benchmarks (CMI) and apply defense‑only allocations; bound autonomy/C2 with adjacent C‑UAS growth and a share‑of‑system‑spend heuristic. Figures are directional and should be refined with customer/program data and pricing observables as the pipeline matures.
Founder Analysis
Founders’ Background Report
Seeing Systems was founded by brothers Alexander Le Maitre (CEO) and Matthew Le Maitre. According to Y Combinator’s company profile, Alexander is a lifelong unmanned‑systems enthusiast who is self‑taught in embedded electronics and PCB design. Prior to founding Seeing Systems, he designed Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) training and diagnostic hardware for military users and contributed to projects with national security implications. He hails from Guernsey and now focuses on building technology that “keeps the country safe.” Companies House filings list Alexander Charles Le Maitre as a director from September 6, 2024, confirming his formal leadership role.
Matthew Le Maitre brings a complementary software and quantitative background. Y Combinator notes he is an ex‑Jane Street software engineer and a top‑ranked Computer Science graduate from the University of Cambridge. His career spans physics and research through to consulting and software engineering, culminating in his role as co‑founder of Seeing Systems focused on defense technology. Companies House records confirm Matthew Stuart Le Maitre became a director on June 6, 2025.
The founders’ skill sets—Alexander’s hands‑on hardware and autonomy experience, and Matthew’s elite quantitative/software training and industry experience—align closely with Seeing Systems’ ambition to build autonomous, modular defense UAV platforms and a swarm control system. Their backgrounds also map directly to the needs of military robotics programs that demand robust hardware, edge AI, and resilient autonomy in contested environments.
Seeing Systems’ own narrative indicates origins tied to the University of Cambridge more than a decade ago and a mission shaped by perceived gaps in UK autonomous drone hardware. The company emphasizes close collaboration with end users (including NGOs and government defense agencies in multiple European countries) and provides not just products but also hands‑on training and consultancy—an approach consistent with founder biographies and the company’s design‑for‑impact ethos.
Unlock Full AI Research Report
Enter your email to access the complete analysis.
We'll never spam you. Unsubscribe anytime.